Multi-Level Converters Topologies

Multi-Level Converters Topologies 

Many industrial applications necessitate power capabilities from medium power to high power. For example, motor drives and utility applications need medium voltage and megawatt levels of power. In medium to high-voltage power applications, multi level converters can be a convenient alternative, due to the fact that the rating limitations of power electronic components disallow connecting for only one power semiconductor switch. They also represent a convenient choice for renewable energy systems. Thus, in the past years, a number of multi-level topologies have emerged (Khomfoi et Tolbert, 2007; Tolbert et Peng, 2000) .

There are a different multilevel inverter topologies have been presented (Franquelo et al., 2008; Kouro et al., 2010; Rodriguez, Jih-Sheng et Fang Zheng, 2002) according to the following steps.

The Cascade H-Bridge

Generally utilized in power drives such as high or medium-voltage (Wu, Converters et Drives, 2006). The cascaded H-Bridge multilevel inverter comprises multiple units of singlephase H-Bridge inverters serially connected in each phase.

The Neutral Point Clamped 

A Neutral Point Clamped multilevel invert’s leg was originally proposed by (Nabae, Takahashi et Akagi, 1981) after which the three-level Neutral Point Clamped found numerous applications and usages in many industries (Rodriguez et al., 2010) “The clamped diodes (D1a, D2a) are linked to the DC capacitors’ neutral point, resulting in adding a zero level to the output voltage. Therefore, in a three-level Neutral Point Clamped, the output voltage is constituted of -Vdc, 0 and +Vdc. When S1a and S2a are ON, the output is + Vdc. When S3a and S4a are ON, the negative voltage appears at the output which is – Vdc. Finally, if S2a and S3a are ON, the voltage at the point (a) will be 0. S3a complements S1a and the same for S2a and S4a. As an example, when S1a is ON, S3a is OFF. This topology’s main advantage is in the fact that it is flexibly controllable by space vector modulation (Lewicki, Krzeminski et Abu Rub, 2011; Rojas, Ohnishi et Suzuki, 1995) additionally to PWM. With this characteristic the Neutral Point Clamped becomes a multilevel inverters’ topology that is favored by researchers, for them to develop its control strategy, by presenting and testing a number of different methods of control (Bor-Ren et TaChang, 2004; Das et Narayanan, 2012). However extensively utilized in applications, of high power the Neutral Point Clamped topology is seen as having the following drawbacks balancing the capacitors voltages and unequal loss distribution among switches”.(Vahedi, 2016)  .

The Diode-Clamped (DC) Topology 

The diode-clamped multilevel inverter is among the main multilevel inverter topologies. The single-phase types of these inverters have been characterized as not having redundant states. Significantly, such states are suitable for reducing devices switching frequency throughout the inverter operation, and hence for reducing switching power losses and targeted to electromagnetic distortion influence. They also enhance other features of inverter performance for example enabling capacitor voltage balancing. It consists in using a number of diodes that will obstruct small DC sources.

“Extending the DC topology to a collective number of level configurations is easy. In a threelevel diode-clamped inverter, the DC bus voltage is separated by capacitor banks into two steps of the same voltage. The inverter’s functioning is simple. The DC topology’s name derives from the voltage between two switches being attached through the clamping diodes. When switches (S1,S2) are on and (S1ʽ,S2ʽ) are off, the inverter’s output voltage is equal to the voltage of C1, which is equal to(+E)/2. Similarly, when switches (S1,S2) are off and (S1ʽ,S2ʽ) are on, the inverter’s output voltage is equal to C2’s voltage, which is equal to (- E)/2. When (S2, S1ʽ) are on and (S1, S2ʽ) are off, the inverter’s output voltage is equal to 0. In a five-level diode-clamped inverter, the DC bus voltage is divided into four steps of the same voltage. Here, the number of diodes needed to clamp the voltage changes point after point. Each diode is set to supply voltage blocking across one capacitor. For example, only one diode represents D1, while three diodes equal to D1 represent D1’, diodes that are in series because they must obstruct voltage through capacitors C2, C3 and C4; in other words, it allows using one diode with higher blocking capacity or three diodes placed in series with same blocking capacity as D1. Considering the diode reverse voltage for a number of level inverters, formulated by V_r=E/(n-1), for a five-level inverter’s -diode revers voltage is equal to E/4, therefore proving that raising the number of levels decreases the components’ voltage stress”.(Vahedi, 2016)  .

Table des matières

CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Multi-Level Converters Topologies
1.2.1 The Cascade H-Bridge
1.2.2 The Neutral Point Clamped
1.2.3 The Diode-Clamped (DC) Topology
1.2.4 The Flying Capacitor (FC) topology
1.3 Control applied to the single-phase five level active filters
1.4 Leblanc Transformer
1.5 Scott versus blanc Transformer
1.6 A single phase to three phase system using Leblanc transformer
1.7 Connection PV solar single phase to three phase system using Leblanc transformer
1.8 Integration of PV solar single phase to three-phase grid using Scott transformer
1.9 Leblanc transformer application to supply railway traction system
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW CONTROL OF SINGLE-PHASE ACTIVE FILTER
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 Different controls applied to single-phase active filters
2.3 Single phase three level boost control
2.3.1 Single phase unified power quality conditioner control
2.4 Indirect current control
2.4.1 Modeling and control for d-q theory
2.4.1.1 Simulation results
2.5 PQ control
2.5.1 Introduction
2.5.2 Modeling and control general PQ control
2.5.3 Direct PQ control
2.5.3.1 Modeling and control
2.5.3.2 Simulation results
2.5.4 Indirect PQ control
2.5.4.1 Simulation results
2.6 Sliding mode control SMC
2.6.1 Introduction
2.6.2 Modeling and control
2.6.3 Simulation results
2.6.4 Nonlinear control
2.6.5 Nonlinear control based Lyapunov direct method
2.6.6 Nonlinear feed-forward controller
2.7 Conclusion
CHAPTER 3 SCOTT AND LEBLANC TRANSFORMERS DESSIGN ANDµ SIMULATION FOR POWER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Modeling of Scott transformer
3.2.1 Current and voltage relationships for Scott transformer
3.2.2 Equivalent loads for Scott transformer
3.3 Modeling of Leblanc transformer
3.3.1 Current and voltage relationships for Leblanc transformer
3.3.2 Equivalent loads for Leblanc transformer
3.4 Comparison of Scott and Leblanc transformer
3.4.1 Validation of Leblanc transformer
CHAPTER 4 INTERFACING OF LEBLANC TRANSFORMER TO SUPPLY
DIFFERENT UTILITIES
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Power quality issues
4.2.1 Harmonic and resonance
4.2.2 System Unbalance
4.2.3 Reactive power
4.2.4 Rail potential and communication impacts
4.2.5 Low-frequency voltage fluctuation
4.2.6 Electrical Plug vehicle using Leblanc connection
4.3.3 Stability analysis
4.3.4 PV solar modeling
4.3.4.1 MPPT algorithm using perturbation and observation
4.3.4.2 Modeling and control of boost converter
4.3.4.3 Discharging Mode
4.3.4.4 Sliding Mode Control of DC-DC converter
4.3.5 SIMULATION RESULTS
4.3.5.1 Simulation results throughout the study state of the system
4.3.5.2 Simulation results throughout unbalanced load
4.3.5.3 Simulation results throughout load variation
4.3.5.4 Simulation results throughout PV Solar variation
4.4 Montreal railway traction supply with added PV solar capacity using Leblanc transformer load balanced
4.4.1 SIMULATION RESULTS
4.4.1.1 Simulation results throughout the study state of the system
4.4.1.2 Simulation results throughout load variation
4.4.1.3 Simulation result throughout unbalanced load
CONCLUSION

Cours gratuitTélécharger le document complet

 

Télécharger aussi :

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *